AI Readiness AssessmentReady for AI?
Check what it will run on.

Data, systems,
owners, people.

We check what an AI system would depend on in your organization: direction, process owners, data access, system interfaces, team skills and adoption barriers. You learn what is in place, what is missing and what to fix first, in the order a build would need it.

Start a Readiness Assessment

A load test on a steel deck with six column positions: Direction, Processes, Data access, Technology, Workforce and Adoption. The Data access column is missing; a red flag marked Missing stands in its empty socket. An AI system rests on the deck, and the deck bends over the gap.

One missing dimension stops the load.

The six dimensions

Six dimensions.
Each one can
stall a build.

We check each one against evidence, not opinion: a signed memo, an access test, a training roster. A gap in any of them can stop a build halfway.

In place
Memo
From: COO · To: Hub operations
Delivery exceptions are a 2026 priority.
Signed
Organizational direction
We check that a named sponsor has made the use case a priority, in writing. Without one, the build stalls at the first hard trade-off.
Partial
Process map · exceptions
1. Logged
2. Hub check
3. Re-deliveryNo owner
4. Customer told
Operational processes
We map how the work runs today and who owns each step. A step with no owner has no one to accept what we build.
Missing
Access request AR-118
- Transport system · read only
- Data owner: Group IT
Access pending
Data availability and access
We test read access to the systems the AI must use, not just whether the data exists. No access, no build.
In place
Systems inventory
- Transport system · documented API
- Customer-service CRM · case log
- Drivers' WhatsApp · in use
Technology and infrastructure
We list every system involved and how it connects: a documented API, an export, or only a screen. That decides what can be integrated, and how.
Partial
Training roster · dispatchers
- Riyadh 1
- Riyadh 2
- Jeddah 1
- Jeddah 2
- Dammam 1
- Dammam 2
3 of 6 hubs trained
Workforce capability
We check who will use, review and run the system, and whether they have the time and training. Untrained teams quietly work around it.
Partial
PDPL note
Customer addresses and phone numbers in drivers' messages
Review not finished
Adoption barriers
We look for what can block go-live: data-protection reviews under PDPL, policy approvals, contracts and front-line resistance. Found late, each one stops a launch.

Our deliverables

Evidence, gaps
and the first fixes.

You get the verdict, the evidence behind it, and the order to fix things.

Assessment summaryRD-031 · 1

Is Rasikh Logistics ready for
AI in delivery exceptions?

6 hubs · transport system, customer-service CRM · data owner: Group IT

DirectionIn place
ProcessesPartial
Data accessMissing
TechnologyIn place
WorkforcePartial
AdoptionPartial

VerdictNot yet. One gap blocks the build, and three need work first.

Fix firstRead access to the transport system. Nothing can be built until it is granted.

Illustrative examplePage 1 of 3

Evidence & gapsRD-031 · 2

What we checked, and what we found

Dimension	What we found	Owner	Status
Organizational direction	Exception handling named a 2026 priority in a memo signed by the COOSource: Signed direction memo	COO	In place
Operational processes	Exception flow mapped at all 6 hubs; no one owns re-deliveries between hubsSource: Process map	Hub operations manager	Partial
Data availability and access	Read access to the transport system requested, not granted yetSource: Access request	Group IT	Missing
Technology and infrastructure	Transport system has a documented API; customer-service cases already logged in the CRMSource: Systems inventory	Group IT	In place
Workforce capability	Dispatcher training done at 3 of the 6 hubsSource: Training roster	Hub managers	Partial
Adoption barriers	PDPL review of customer addresses and phone numbers in drivers' messages not finishedSource: Adoption risk note	Data protection officer	Partial

Illustrative examplePage 2 of 3

What to fix firstRD-031 · 3

The gaps, in the order
the build needs them

Each gap has one owner and the evidence that closes it. No dates: the order comes from what depends on what.

1
Data availability and accessMissingBlocks the build
Grant read access to the transport system
Owner
Group IT
Closed when
Access tested on a sample of real exceptions
2
Adoption barriersPartialNeeds 1 first
Finish the PDPL review of customer details in drivers' messages
Owner
Data protection officer
Closed when
A signed note on what the system may keep, and for how long
3
Operational processesPartial
Name one owner for re-deliveries between hubs
Owner
Hub operations manager
Closed when
The owner written into the exception procedure
4
Workforce capabilityPartialNeeds 3 first
Train the dispatchers at the other 3 hubs
Owner
Hub managers
Closed when
Training roster complete for all 6 hubs

Then, only if you choose: an AI Solution Blueprint for delivery-exception handling. A separate engagement, not a scheduled step.

Illustrative examplePage 3 of 3

Readiness or Audit?

Two questions.
Two different studies.

Can our data, systems and people carry AI at all?

AI Readiness Assessment

Start a Readiness Assessment

Where does AI pay off across our operations?

AI Transformational Audit

Illustrative example

You can commission each one on its own.
Each one can lead you to a paid AI Solution Blueprint.
Ting builds nothing without a Blueprint.

Have a solution in mind already? Take it straight to an AI Solution Blueprint

Guides

All guides All comparisons

Your next step

AI Readiness AssessmentReady for AI? Check what it will run on.

Six dimensions. Each one can stall a build.

Organizational direction

Operational processes

Data availability and access

Technology and infrastructure

Workforce capability

Adoption barriers

Evidence, gaps and the first fixes.

Two questions. Two different studies.

Guides

Fix the foundations.Then build on them.

AI Readiness AssessmentReady for AI?
Check what it will run on.

Six dimensions.
Each one can
stall a build.

Evidence, gaps
and the first fixes.

Two questions.
Two different studies.

Fix the foundations.
Then build on them.